Some work-in-progress on making btDbvtBroadphase deterministic. When using the btSortedOverlappingPairCache, it seems deterministic now. todo: when using btHashedOverlappingPairCache.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ public:
|
||||
void updateHandle(BP_FP_INT_TYPE handle, const btVector3& aabbMin,const btVector3& aabbMax,btDispatcher* dispatcher);
|
||||
SIMD_FORCE_INLINE Handle* getHandle(BP_FP_INT_TYPE index) const {return m_pHandles + index;}
|
||||
|
||||
void resetPool();
|
||||
virtual void resetPool(btDispatcher* dispatcher);
|
||||
|
||||
void processAllOverlappingPairs(btOverlapCallback* callback);
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -588,7 +588,7 @@ void btAxisSweep3Internal<BP_FP_INT_TYPE>::removeHandle(BP_FP_INT_TYPE handle,bt
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
template <typename BP_FP_INT_TYPE>
|
||||
void btAxisSweep3Internal<BP_FP_INT_TYPE>::resetPool()
|
||||
void btAxisSweep3Internal<BP_FP_INT_TYPE>::resetPool(btDispatcher* dispatcher)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (m_numHandles == 0)
|
||||
{
|
||||
@@ -611,86 +611,8 @@ void btAxisSweep3Internal<BP_FP_INT_TYPE>::calculateOverlappingPairs(btDispatche
|
||||
|
||||
if (m_pairCache->hasDeferredRemoval())
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
||||
btBroadphasePairArray& overlappingPairArray = m_pairCache->getOverlappingPairArray();
|
||||
|
||||
//perform a sort, to find duplicates and to sort 'invalid' pairs to the end
|
||||
overlappingPairArray.quickSort(btBroadphasePairSortPredicate());
|
||||
|
||||
overlappingPairArray.resize(overlappingPairArray.size() - m_invalidPair);
|
||||
m_invalidPair = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
int i;
|
||||
|
||||
btBroadphasePair previousPair;
|
||||
previousPair.m_pProxy0 = 0;
|
||||
previousPair.m_pProxy1 = 0;
|
||||
previousPair.m_algorithm = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
for (i=0;i<overlappingPairArray.size();i++)
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
||||
btBroadphasePair& pair = overlappingPairArray[i];
|
||||
|
||||
bool isDuplicate = (pair == previousPair);
|
||||
|
||||
previousPair = pair;
|
||||
|
||||
bool needsRemoval = false;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!isDuplicate)
|
||||
{
|
||||
bool hasOverlap = testAabbOverlap(pair.m_pProxy0,pair.m_pProxy1);
|
||||
|
||||
if (hasOverlap)
|
||||
{
|
||||
needsRemoval = false;//callback->processOverlap(pair);
|
||||
} else
|
||||
{
|
||||
needsRemoval = true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else
|
||||
{
|
||||
//remove duplicate
|
||||
needsRemoval = true;
|
||||
//should have no algorithm
|
||||
btAssert(!pair.m_algorithm);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (needsRemoval)
|
||||
{
|
||||
m_pairCache->cleanOverlappingPair(pair,dispatcher);
|
||||
|
||||
// m_overlappingPairArray.swap(i,m_overlappingPairArray.size()-1);
|
||||
// m_overlappingPairArray.pop_back();
|
||||
pair.m_pProxy0 = 0;
|
||||
pair.m_pProxy1 = 0;
|
||||
m_invalidPair++;
|
||||
gOverlappingPairs--;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
///if you don't like to skip the invalid pairs in the array, execute following code:
|
||||
#define CLEAN_INVALID_PAIRS 1
|
||||
#ifdef CLEAN_INVALID_PAIRS
|
||||
|
||||
//perform a sort, to sort 'invalid' pairs to the end
|
||||
overlappingPairArray.quickSort(btBroadphasePairSortPredicate());
|
||||
|
||||
overlappingPairArray.resize(overlappingPairArray.size() - m_invalidPair);
|
||||
m_invalidPair = 0;
|
||||
#endif//CLEAN_INVALID_PAIRS
|
||||
|
||||
//printf("overlappingPairArray.size()=%d\n",overlappingPairArray.size());
|
||||
m_pairCache->performDeferredRemoval(dispatcher);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user